Wednesday 28 December 2011

The parliamentary epetition to re-establish the National Centre for Excellence in Residential Child Care has closed. Where now for residential child care?



The epetition, initiated by David Lane on the No.10 Downing Street website asking the government to re-establish the National Centre for Excellence in Residential Child Care or its equivalent to provide leadership, support and advice for residential child care services has closed and has attracted insufficient signatures to be considered a subject for debate in the House of Commons. It was perhaps predictable that residential child care would not raise the 100,000 signatures needed for this to happen. At least the petition provided an opportunity to publicise residential child care's need for greater recognition and support. However, the number of signatures the petition garnered, 268, may be cause for disappointment. This is not because 256,645 have signed to end "all the financial welfare benefits of those convicted of a criminal act" during the riots early this year, not because 134,638 have signed to end "mass immigration" nor indeed because 39,173 have petitioned to insist that all Formula 1 motor races should be on "free to air" television. All these may tell us something about what is currently important to those who are signing petitions but they are issues which have a greater constituency than residental child care. No, the disappointment may be that the number of signatories for re-establishing the NCERCC represents such a sparse response from a population which even at a minimal estimate includes 100,000 adults residing in the United Kingdom who have been, at some time in their lives, in residential child care or residential education (excluding the private "public school" system) and probably more than 25,000 people who are or have been directly or indirectly employed in the residential care and education sector. Given this (admittedly estimated) number the total of 268 signatures on this petition might be thought exceedingly low. This may tell us that relatively few people in this sector of care had felt they benefited from the services provided by NCERCC but certainly the responses received by goodenoughcaring relating to the closure of NCERCC were unanimous in their praise for the Centre. It may be saying that most are content with the recognition, training and support they receive. Another conclusion might be drawn that those who have been in any way involved in residential child care are almost invariably critical of it, or indifferent about it. Alternatively,the result may not represent criticism or indifference but simply demonstrate a lack of awareness of government epetitions, yet the possibility remains that the relative dearth of signatories is a reflection of the pessimism within residential child care; a sense of "Why bother ? Our resources will be cut whatever we say or do." If this were so, it would be an unhelpful pedestal on which to be stuck, given that in these times services to children and young people are diminishing at a significant - not to say alarming - rate, and at the best of times residential child care services have not ranked high on a politician's list of vote winning issues. Now may be a good time, for all those involved in residential child care, including those who support it as teachers, as publicists, as administrators and as politicians to fall in line with the spirit underpinning David Lane's petition. This calls for the development of an articulate and cogent argument for the provision of high quality residential care for those children and young people whose needs it can undoubtably be the best at meeting.
Evidence that determined and well thought out argument can bring change is evident in Essex County Council's decision to postpone its plans to close 7 of its 8 children's homes following an application by a 17 years old young man for a judicial review of the Council's closure plan. The young man argued that the authority, in taking the decision to close the homes, had failed to take account of his individual needs. The High Court Judge thought the authority's decision to close the homes by December 15th was unreasonable. Essex County Council has now issued a legally enforcable undertaking not to close any of its homes as long as those homes are needed by its "settled" looked after children and young people (Lauren Higgs,CYP Now November 28th, 2011). This change of policy may only represent a postponement but the young man's determination to stand up successfully for his right to have continuity of care in his children's home is a triumph for him and a fillip for residential child care.


This opinion piece first appeared on December 27th, 2011, on the goodenoughcaring website home page at
 http://www.goodenoughcaring.com/ 

Thursday 1 December 2011

Flying through an ethereal letterbox near you : issue 10 of the goodenoughcaring Journal lands on December 15th


The new issue of the goodenoughcaring Journal goes online in mid-December. The new issue of the goodenoughcaring Journal goes online in mid-December. In our last issue John Stein wrote about the influence of mothers and so one of the themes of this next issue is the relatively less considered matter of fatherhood and aspects of this are explored in a poem by Jan Noble and in articles by Joyce Carol Oates, Alex Russon, Mark Smith and John Stein. Marion Bennathan writes about nurture groups in schools and Cynthia Cross recollects the nature of residential child care in the 1960s and compares it with current practice. Jeremy Millar makes a personal assessment of the work and thoughts of Chris Beedell while Moira Strachan discusses the relevance of a child observation placement toward her development as a social care worker. Noel Howard has written a moving review of Danny Ellis' CD 800 Voices : the heartache and the healing. John Molloy's remarkable review of Richard Webster's book The Secret of Bryn Estyn which is currently on this page in the section about Richard Webster will also be published. News of further articles will appear here within the next few days.

This notice first appeared on the goodenoughcaring homepage at http://www.goodenoughcaring.com/ on December 1st, 2011

Monday 12 September 2011

International Seminar on the History of Child Care


Child Care:Learning from History

An International Seminar on the History of Child Care will be hosted by Scotland's New Centre for Excellence for Looked After Children and the Child Care History Network (CCHN) on Monday, 7th November, 2011 at Jury's Inn, Glasgow.
The aim of this international seminar is to consider issues concerning the history of child care, in particular focusing on lessons which have been learnt which can affect current and future practice.The seminar will be based partly on the experience of the host country, Scotland,while speakers and participants from other countries will also be involved. It will cover statutory, voluntary and private child care services, and both personal and organisational histories.
The seminar will present an exciting and varied range of speakers.
The content of the seminar will be of relevance to managers of child care services and practitioners, as well as regulators, academics and researchers. There will be additional activities before and after the Seminar, including the opportunity for study visits to local projects on Tuesday 8th November.
Confirmed Speakers,in programme order, include:
Professor David Divine (England): Formerly James Robinson Johnston Chair in Black Canadian Studies, Dalhousie University, Canada, 2004 - 2009, currently undertaking furtherpostgraduate study at Durham University.

Keith White (England): Director of Mill Grove Residential Community in East London.

Mark Smith (Scotland): Lecturer in Social Work at the University of Edinburgh and formerly lecturer at the Scottish Institute for Residential Child Care.

Moyra Hawthorn (Scotland): Lecturer at the New Centre.

Zachari Duncalf (Scotland): Research Fellow at the New Centre. Angela Davis (England): British Academy funded post-doctoral research fellow in the Department of History at the University of Warwick.

Beno Schraepen (Belgium): Graduate of the University of Ghent and founder of INCENA (the study centre for inclusion and enablement) in partnership with the University of Antwerp.

Delyth Edwards (Northern Ireland): Completing a PhD at the School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Queens University Belfast.

Christine Oliver (England): Senior Research Officer at the Thomas Coram Research Unit.

Renuka Jeyarajah-Dent (England): Director of Operations / Deputy CEO at Coram, the UK’s oldest children’s charity.

Ian Milligan (Scotland): Senior Lecturer at the New Centre.

Ann Kirson Swersky (United States): Independent scholar. Her current research was carried out on the records of the Monson State Primary School in the Massachusetts State Archives.

Shurlee Swain (Australia): Professor at the School of Arts and Sciences at the Australian Catholic University in Victoria.

Sue Owen (England): Director of the Well-being Department at the National Children’s Bureau and formerly Director of National Children’s Bureau’s Early Childhood Unit.

Kristian Bredby (Norway): Director of the Sanitetsforening Brusetkollen in Oslo.

Jim Goddard (England): Senior Lecturer in Social Policy at the University of Bradford and Secretary of the Care Leavers’ Association.
For further information :
General enquiries should be made to the Office for the New Centre:

Tel:             0141 950 3683

Email: "sirccevents@strath.ac.uk"

"www.sircc.org.uk/CCHN"

"www.thenewcentre.org.uk"

"www.cchn.org.uk"

This item first appeared on the home page of the goodenoughcaring website at http://www.goodenoughcaring.com/ on September 11th 2011.

Monday 5 September 2011

A petition for the return of the National Centre for Excellence in Residential Child Care



David Lane has written to tell us of a petition on the No. 10 Downing Street website asking the government to re-establish the NCERCC or an equivalent body to provide leadership, support and advice for residential child care services. This petition is being supported by the Institute of for Childcare and Social Education and the Social Care Association. David asks everyone who supports this to sign up to the petition as soon as possible and to tell others who may be interested about the petition. To sign up, Google "petitions" or go direct to www.epetitions.direct.gov.uk. The title of the petition is NCERCC.
It is to be hoped that substantial support for the petition will send the government a message. Since every person signs individually and everyt person's name counts, David believes that it is "something to which everyone concerned can lend their support."  If you require more information contact David at DCL.Davidlane.org


Many readers will recall the general dismay which ran through the world of residential child care in England when at the beginning of 2010 the last government surprisingly called a halt to the funding of the palpably successful NCERCC and gave over some of the Centre's  functions to a private consortium called "Tribal". The current government decided to pull the plug on the Tribal contract but since that time residential child care has not been offered any support  to fill the void created by the closure of the NCERCC. We support the ICSE and SCA in their call for a return of the NCERCC.

This news and opinion item first appeared on the home page of the goodenoughcaring website at http://www.goodenoughcaring.com on September 4th, 2011.



Monday 8 August 2011

Richard Webster


August,  2011 Mark Smith writes

I returned from holiday earlier this month to an e-mail telling me that Richard Webster had died. I had never met Richard but had three or four telephone conversations with him and felt I knew him. He was a warm and open man whose curious and probing mind was all too evident even at the other end of a phone. Yet, although I felt I knew Richard, on hearing of his death I realised that I actually knew nothing about him, other than the rather stark biography offered on his website richardwebster.net, telling that ‘Richard Webster was born in 1950 and studied English literature at the University of East Anglia’.Bob Woffinden’s obituary in The Guardian, www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jul/31/richard-webster-obituary was, in that sense, very welcome in giving a bit more detail on Richard. I can’t help thinking that there is something quintessentially English about his life. The village postmaster, turned bookshop owner cum writer, writing, in Woffinden’s words, not for profit, ‘but to set down a scrupulously accurate record.’In his quest for this scrupulously accurate record, he exposed what is one of the great injustices of our time – the witch-hunt that has resulted in thousands of care workers and former care workers being investigated for abuse and the questionable convictions of perhaps hundreds of these.
This story is set out in Webster’s magisterial book ‘The Secret of Bryn Estyn’ (2005), which delves into the child abuse allegations and inquiries that erupted in North Wales over the late 1990s. The real secret of Bryn Estyn, as Woffinden says, ‘was that there was no secret at all; it was just an ordinary community home where staff did their best to look after difficult adolescents.’
One of the attractions for me in Richard’s writing was its reassuring solidity. When he committed any contentious argument to print you could be sure that he had at least a couple of lever arch files to substantiate what he was saying. And when he calls what has happened in respect of investigations against former care workers a witch-hunt, you can be sure that the use of the term is not a throwaway line, but is rooted in his deep understanding of cultural history. The strength of argument in ‘Bryn Estyn’ and Richard’s other writing is compelling. While many may not like what he has to say, because it deconstructs and destabilises received accounts of abuse in residential child care, I have not come across anyone who has been able to contest his evidence.
What is missing from Bob Woffinden’s obituary is any reference to Richard’s role in the unraveling of the Haut De La Garenne episode in Jersey. As events there were beginning to break, Richard phoned me to ask what I thought of it. I put my neck out and suggested that no bodies or unexplained human remnants would be found. He agreed and hung up saying he would need to go over to Jersey. The result of that visit and some fairly elementary detective work uncovered the fact that the finding purported to be a piece of human skull was in fact a piece of wood or coconut shell.
The issue of historical abuse is, I believe, one on which the very future of residential child care rests. We need to be able to come to an understanding of our past that is based upon the kind of reasoned and balanced evidence that Webster provides. For that reason,I consider ‘The Secret of Bryn Estyn’ to be one of the most important books to have been written on residential child care, although its scope extends to offer fascinating insights into the human condition more generally.
Professor Jean La Fontaine, who was instrumental in dismissing earlier satanic ritual abuse scares calls ‘Bryn Estyn’‘an extraordinary book … gripping and coherent ... a major achievement ... Webster has admirably succeeded in what the police … and two successive [inquiries] failed to do: discover what really happened.’ Evening Standard. Christian Wolmar, the journalist who wrote an earlier book on abuse in children’s homes, is also a somewhat grudging convert, noting that ‘It is unarguable that Webster has a powerful case. The book will make uncomfortable reading for all those involved in investigating these cases, from police and lawyers to journalists and judges. Webster's forensic skill ... could well have been used by all of them, too. . . [His] detailed exposition of how the "scandal" unfolded, despite scant hard evidence, should be required reading for newsdesks.' ?This last point becomes all the more salient in light of what we now know was going on at ‘The News of the World’. One can only wonder about the role of networks involving journalists, police and those alleging to have been abused in care in constructing a particular version of residential child care’s past. Richard’s work provides an important antidote to such accounts. Hopefully, it will receive the attention it deserves after his death.
Mark Smith's review of Richard Webster's book "The Secret of Bryn Estyn" can be accessed at http://www.goodenoughcaring.com/JournalArticle.aspx?cpid=143
Comments

John Molloy  writes "I am reluctant to make any comment on the death of Richard Webster because I know nothing of the man or his writings. Having read all the positive comments about him, I intend to get a copy of “The Secret of Bryn Estyn” and to read it carefully. Mark Smith’s obituary, and the contributions that have followed, have raised a number of interesting issues for me that leave me feeling a bit uncomfortable.
"I was horrified when I first read of the allegations of satanic abuse in the Orkney Islands. Equally, I was shocked by the out-of-control ‘crusade’ nature of what happened at Cleveland. These two scandals in particular helped to influence my thinking in dealing with issues that emerged in a centre where I worked where a number of sexual abuse allegations against two male staff emerged. The British experience helped to “keep me honest” in how I approached my situation. That said, my reading of the numerous enquiries into sexual abuse in Britain did little to prepare me for what I was experiencing in Ireland. I read aspects of every report published around that time, or at least the commentaries on the reports. That was because, with the exception of the Hughes Report into allegations about Kincora, there were no reports available in Ireland at that time. It was not until the mid- 1990’s that the first emerged. The issues raised in the Ryan Report, the two separate Murphy Reports (swimming coaches and clergy), Madonna House, Kilkenny, etc had not as yet surfaced.
"The salacious interest in ritual satanic abuse here did not manifest itself in the Irish media in the same way as in Britain. There was nothing salacious for the media to frenzy-feed on here, given that catholic priests and brothers, and indeed nuns were a dominant grouping in the abuse of children in Ireland. There is a well perpetuated myth in Ireland that no one knew of what was going on. It is self-evident that this is not true. Apart from the abusers and the abused, there were those who knew of the culture that existed in Ireland throughout the nineteen forties, fifties and sixties in particular. Even in our National schools, the stories told and experienced by those of us who went to Christian Brother Schools of sadism, brutality and “being interfered with” were widespread. Everyone knew. Nobody cared. As school boys in the nineteen sixties we even joked in school about why we had to sit on Brother O C’s knee to have our homework corrected!
"The media were gutless, as were the authorities, be they in education, policing, or care. The culture of Catholic control did not allow for stories to be published, and even worse, I would argue, that in Irish Society, there were many who assumed that a good education made it acceptable.
"While there seemed a crusade at times in Britain that went over the top in trying to 'out' all kinds of child abuse, I believe the Irish experience to have been a far more insidious and dangerous scenario.
"There are few things worse than allegations being made about a person. Regardless of the facts, there are usually two immediate camps formed. One represents those who can believe no bad about the person, the other represents those who believe no good about the person. Usually the person involved falls between both in isolation, lost in a limbo of having lost their reputation regardless of how good all their previous work was. Where the allegations are false this isolation and devastation takes on a much greater significance.
"My experiences, in Ireland, are that there is no great malevolence in what happens – just a total lack of awareness of the impact of what that devastation and isolation is like. Social Work investigations are carried out in a slow dragged out manner where the powers that be show a reluctance to bring the matter to closure ‘just in case’….  It often takes threats of legal action to get the matter sorted.
"I read the comments about people being 'regarded as guilty until proven innocent.'  I do not find such language useful in this area. While the expression 'innocent until proven guilty' is a legal phrase used widely in every day use, we need to remind ourselves that it is a phrase that only has relevance in the context of justice dealt out by the Courts. It is a fact that a number of high profile cases of inappropriate sexual activity, allegations of abuse, and use of child pornography have gone to court in Ireland where cases have collapsed on technicalities. We have to say that in these cases the person has not been proved guilty. In legal language they are therefore innocent; innocent 'in the eyes of the law'. While I do not know how the British legal systems work, (I dare not mention Birmingham or Guildford) I am aware that in Ireland it is very difficult for any one of middle class back-ground who can afford good legal council to be convicted, unless they prove really inept in the defence of their abuse, or carrying out of their abuse.
"I stated some of the comments made in respect of the death of Richard Webster made me uncomfortable. Most were made in a British context with which I am not familiar. Over my thirty five years in this line of work allegations were made against me. One of these was a very serious allegation and caused me great distress. I fought to have my name cleared and did so successfully. When I consider what some of the young people in my care have experienced at the hands of staff members I have worked alongside, I have no doubt that the balance of justice still hangs in favour of the perpetrators. My distress is a price I was more than willing to accept. While we may talk of the hundreds who have been falsely accused, our real energy should be devoted to building robust systems that protect both young people and staff."

Mark Smith  responds " I agree absolutely about the feigned surprise at what was or wasn't going on, especially in Ireland. This is the one point I would maybe depart from Richard Webster - I think he should perhaps have considered that there was what we would now call physical abuse (which was probably in the past thought of as discipline). The divide between abuse and 'normal' upbringing is one that interests me. It raises a whole load of
other questions about assumed effects of such abuse or treatment - one of my worries is that we risk constructing 'victims' and then not being able to offer them the promised 'release' or whatever it is a therapeutic discourse promises ."



Noel Howard  writes about 'the death of Richard Webster', " We all accept the truism that there are two sides to every story. Saddened by the death of Richard Webster it strikes me that he was someone who critically saw that there are often many sides to every story.
"I read The Secret of Bryn Estynin the summer of 2009 and alternated that with reading extracts from the voluminous Ryan Report which had been published in May of that year.All I will say is that it was a disconcerting, challenging and uncomfortable experience reading both. With the benefit of hindsight I can say it was an extremely worthwhile experience. It has crystallised for me much of what I believe to be necessary in creating a culture where natural justice has a part to play when allegations of sexual abuse against those who work with children are made. Indeed, and this perhaps does need to be said ad nauseam, it is perhaps the only highly significant area where the accused is guilty until proven innocent contrary to one of the fundamental principles of  our system of justice. Unfortunately, and this has also to be said over and over again, any genuine, critical questioning of particular abuse allegations can leave one very much on the margins in an atmosphere and climate (particularly in Ireland for obvious reasons) where so much has emerged in recent years around the institutional and clerical abuse of children. Indeed, we have not seen the last of such reports in Ireland, though they do not all have to do with children in care.
"But back to Richard. Of course anyone involved in working with children should read The Secret of Bryn Estyn. It’s a real page turner and I believe anyone who has read it must have paused on many occasions and asked “how could this have happened?” Richard was far from an apologist for child abusers – he simply contested that, yes, child abuse does take place, it takes place in society at large and in some residential units. In subtitling the book on Bryn Estyn The making of a modern witch hunt he clearly saw how bureaucratic self justification, innuendo, half truths, downright lies and the suggestion of compensation led to the lives of innocent caring adults being shattered. The bungled efforts to find  and convict the abusers dragged those innocent of any wrongdoing into a nightmare that has to be read about to be believed.
"The UK legal system, as with Ireland, is  there to convict the guilty and exonerate the innocent. In relation to child abuse allegations those innocents become victims of another kind – good people falsely accused or forever guilty by association who must often question what naïve, altruistic motive made them become part of a profession in the first place that just might change the miserable, blighted lives of children in care. After years perhaps of doing just that and doing it well, the merest hint of suspicion can bring them and those close to them down, never to recover. Some such idealists appear in Richard’s book on Bryn Estyn.
"Others also appear. In the light of recent revelations around News International in the UK we can appreciate a little more the lengths to which “respected” individuals in various “respected” walks of life will go to facilitate others in getting  and making a story that satisfies the whetted, prurient appetites of those who believe that there is much more wrong with human nature than right.
In his forensic, patient analysis, Richard has much to say about how the characters and lives of good people can be shredded when suspect agendas are set, often masquerading as a search for the truth. His detailed study  of the Waterhouse tribunal and report is fascinating and all in all, The Secret of Bryn Estyn classically shows how those at the highest level in their respective professions sometimes just cannot see the wood for the trees.
"I was fortunate to have had the privilege of exchanging a few emails with Richard. He referred to the twelve years he had spent, unintentionally in the first place, researching the Bryn Estyn story. He felt he had had enough after all those years and said “I am also, I have to confess, battle weary, and sometimes feel that I have been engaged in a war which cannot be won – not at least by conventional means.”
"He elaborated on his battle weariness in an email to a colleague in Europe to which I am privy. It’s really a beautifully haunting line considering all he had done. It goes “Sometimes you just want to take your tin hat off and get back to tilling the soil in the fields you left before you went off to war.”
Like so many others who do good things and fight their own private wars Richard probably felt he never won the war he engaged in. Yet, somehow I feel he did. For those who have faced false allegations Richard’s victory was not a pyrrhic one. In his outstanding study of what really happened around Bryn Estyn and other care homes at the heart of his research, he succeeded in finding what two high powered enquiries and the police did not - the truth of what really happened. For that we should be eternally grateful.
"Interestingly, he said his real study was human nature and he certainly unearthed the very best and worst of that in the Secret of Bryn Estyn.
Only the actions of the just, Smell sweet and blossom in the dust. (James Shirley 1596-1666)."

Cynthia Cross comments, "I went to the launch of Richard Websters book, 'The Secret of Bryn Estyn' at Portcullis House Westminster on 10/03/2005.
"To most people it must seem a long time after the closing of New Barns in 1992, due to a child protection inquiry, and the subsequent acquiting of all 7 defendents in February 1996 after 3 months in Bristol Crown Court; but some things never go away.  New Barns was a unique therapeutic community for children, practicing shared responsibility between adults and children. Nearly all adults lived in as the job was seen as living with children, and using every situation that occurred in daily life as therapeutically as possible.  All workers were part of the therapeutic team and whether they were primarily teacher or child care orientated they were paid on the same pay scale .... I could go on.
"The work of Richard Webster was extremely important to us; he was someone who was not only prepared to challenge the validity of some of the attacks on residential care,(When some people were implying and sometimes openly saying that all residential child care workers were suspect) but also put in the research work to prove his point. He was therefore heard and respected by a number of important people. The book launch hosted by Claire Curtis-Thomas was an example of this.
It is sad that he died so young, we have lost a valuable ally."

Max Smart comments, "Such sad news to read of Richard Webster's death, and I am grateful for this highly illuminating and reflective obituary by Mark. My take on Bryn Estyn affair is similarly controversial. My gut reaction to the issues of historical abuse is not to deny that some abuse took place and that victims of these abuses have been scarred and traumatised.However, some context has to be placed on accounts, such as time and culture of society at the time. If no such context is placed then the lens in which abuse is viewed and measured is from the luxurious position of hindsight, where care practice and culture is different than the time it was taking place. If the time and context of the culture is not taken into account, then if our care practices are viewed 40 years down the line, it may look as if our practices were like the "Spanish Inquisition". Secondly I'm concerned that current methods of investigating historical abuse seem to turn "natural justice" upon its head. Natural justice would assume innocence until proven guilty. Historical abuse appears to view alleged perpetrators as guilty until proven innocent.Thirdly, I always assumed that police on receiving a report of a crime being committed, investigate it, attain evidence as to alleged guilt or innocence and proceed to the judicial stage on this evidence if it is required. This seems markedly different in the way that enquiries are handled when it comes to investigating historical abuse, where police appear to contact people to seek out a crime. When this is combined with the apparent incentive of "compensation" it can become a significant source for concern about whether the ends of justice are met. Finally, it concerns me, that just like the "Ryan Report" in Ireland, and likely the "Time to be Heard" report due in Scotland, it seems that the great financial beneficiaries here are lawyer who have made miilions. So I have many mixed feelings about the way that historical abuse has been considered. There is not a shadow of a doubt that the abuse of children and young people, whether it be in residential care or foster care, is unacceptable and is to be utterly condemned, and those who commit it should be accountable, and those who suffered should have justice. However, the unintended consequence of the hysteria created in some of these scandals, is to discourage males going into care work and at times to create sterile care environments where people are afraid to touch a child for fear of allegation".

Nigel Hinks comments, "I am ashamed to confess to not knowing the name of Richard Webster. Having read both obituaries I felt moved by his portrayal, and also another premature passing. There is a counter view that should perhaps be distanced from any response to any individual's pursuit of justice and balance, or anything perceived as directly challenging such tributes to Richard Webster. There has to be due recognition of how unbalanced and prejudicial media reporting has whipped up frenzy, and methodical evidential reporting is crucial in challenging this form of journalism.Yet we also know that abusers sought out these settings for their systematic criminality. To condemn all on the basis of irresponsible enquiry, designed for headlines alone, is equal to indifference.
 "My position, as a young social worker in the early 70's, seeking to intervene in the damaged lives of children and young people, is tinged with the regret and guilt of unwittingly delivering them to the doors of such institutions (in North Wales) and to (some of) those hiding behind their labels of 'specialist carers'."

Bob Forrest comments, "I was sorry to hear about Richard Webster and pleased that Mark mentioned his contribution to the debunking of the Jersey farce.It's such a pity that Webster's work is relatively unknown to the general populace.I of course mentioned The Secret of Bryn Estyn to Eddie Frizzell, who chaired the Scottish government's investigation into the Kerelaw affair and I am still trying to get my copy of it back from my MSP. It is sad that so many people in influential positions still refuse to allow facts to influence their opinions.
"A couple of years ago I sat in on an employment tribunal considering the sacking of 2 Kerelaw teachers. A witness for Glasgow Cuty Council,one of the education directors, was asked by the teachers' lawyer why he believed the one witness who said "black" as opposed to the seven witnesses who said "white".He replied that he believed the seven were in collusion. When asked whom he would have believed if seventy witnesses had said "white", he said that he would still believe the one who said "black" because the others were in collusion!!As you could imagine there was an audible gasp from the public gallery! I immediately emailed Frizzell to suggest that he and his team would benefit from a visit to the employment tribunal to gain some insight into Glasgow City Council's thought processes but in the event Glasgow threw in the towel the very next day and accepted that the teachers had been wrongfully dismissed!!
"The sad thing is that no lessons ever seem to get learned from the Bryn Estyn,Shelburne,Kerelaw experiences nor indeed from Orkney,Cleveland and goodness knows how many others."

Jeremy Millar comments, "There is certainly a fear factor present in challenging the establishment orthodoxy. My instinct tells me that rampant abuse was never an issue but that small pockets of abusive practice probably did exist either in the shape of a ‘charismatic leader’ or a rogue individual able to charm and dupe residents and colleagues. My take on the whole issue is more structural in relation to the way anglo american society views children and oppresses them in adult dominated settings. The answer is to empower children to challenge abusive adults and expose their practice to scrutiny. Social pedagogic approaches work in this way and promote inclusiveness for children. It will come as no surprise that I practised this position as a young person. A teacher at the school was persecuting a sister of my best mate because of my mate’s dislike of his attitude. We organised a rota whereby 2-3 of us would follow this teacher everywhere he went in the school at 5 paces behind. We would meet him coming out of the staff room and follow him to class and so on. He tried to address us but we totally blanked him. He quickly laid off the sister but couldn’t take any measures against us as it would have been humiliation in front of his colleagues.
"Once you have been empowered through direct action it never leaves you and I believe that adult society is subconsciously scared of offering this option to children. Instead we promote procedural approaches to conflict resolution that don’t deliver and develop apathy and cynicism. The young people who take direct action outwith the procedures are pathologised and come into care where their legitimate rage is held up as their problem. We drug them, lock them up and gently browbeat them into accepting their lot and their potential seeps away bit by bit as they drift in the system."



Wednesday 1 June 2011

Poor Kids


On June 7th 2011 BBC television will screen a documentary film, Poor Kids, which tells the stories of four of the 3.5 million children living in poverty in the United Kingdom. The UK has one of the worst child poverty rates in the industrialised world, and successive governments have struggled to deal adequately with this problem. The film highlights who these children are, and how and where they live.  On the goodenoughcaring website we have, together with many other organisations and publications, drawn attention to this under-represented and all too often under-nourished group of children. We cannot so far claim to have had a great deal of positive influence. We hope that this film may be more successful. The film gives voice to the overall problem of child poverty by observing how four youngsters, from different areas within the UK, Courtney, aged 8, Paige aged 10, Sam aged 11 and Sam's sister Kayleigh, aged 16 cope with having little or nothing. In an honest and telling way they show how having no money impacts upon their lives : lack of food, being bullied and having nowhere to play. The children are indignant about their situation but unless we as a community really confront their problem with them, their indignance will not be enough to help them in the future.  Their own thoughts on their future are sobering.
Sam's 16-year-old sister Kayleigh puts a context to the probability of this bleak future, as she tells how the effects of poverty led her to take extreme measures in trying to escape it all.
The director of Poor Kids, Jezza Neumann, has put the children on centre stage, and they command it with honesty and directness. We urge everyone to watch.
The film will be screened at 22.35 on 7th June, 2011 on BBC 1, except in Northern Ireland and Wales, where it will be shown on the same day at 23.35.



While on the theme of televison journalism, considerable controversy has arisen about the ethics of televison journalism and the latter's relationship to social care services following the screening of an investigatory Panorama programme about Winterbourne View hospital/care home. We have set up a time limited blog (closes on 15/6/11) for anyone who wishes to comment on the issue and we will forward the responses to the BBC and the Panorama production team. You will find the blog at   
http://tvjournalismsocialcare.blogspot.com/


This article first appeared on May 30th, 2011,  on the goodenoughcaring website home page at
http://www.goodenoughcaring.com/Home.aspx?cpid=1

Friday 13 May 2011

No free parking for kids in Wandsworth



The London Borough of Wandsworth council has announced it is to charge £2.50 for each child who wishes play in the Adventure Playground in Battersea Park.* This initiative will bring extra money into the council coffers, although in the coming year Wandsworth council is cutting its services to children to the tune of £3.5 million.
The new charges at Battersea will be fine for children whose parents can afford the entrance fees, but it's a shame for those children whose parents are out of work or in low paid jobs. Apart from limiting the opportunity to play for the children of less well off parents, this Wandsworth initiative also seems to fly in the face of the Department of Health's Change4Life programme which promotes the idea that healthy children need exercise.
Is this action by the Wandsworth council a symbolic and a practical representation of what we really think these days about children and in particular the children of parents who are not affluent ?


This opinion item first appeared on May 13th, 2011 on the goodenoughcaring website at 
http://www.goodenoughcaring.com



   


Sunday 24 April 2011

Being too critical of parents



Parents who both consciously and intuitively reflect carefully on their own behaviour towards their children are likely to be adults who have come to terms with most of their own anxieties. It is probable that as children they were cared for well enough. Often the parents of children considered to need additional support to look after their children are not so free of the anxiety insecurity brings. This is not to place blame. These parents are frequently prisoners of their own upbringing and all too often the victims of an acquisitive society where status based on wealth is a predominant value. Their own experience of family may offer them little to fall back on when they struggle with the give and take of relationships which are so much a part of healthy family life. They may not feel able to create the kind of family environment which provides good social examples,consistent warmth and underlying harmony as well as intellectual stimulus and challenge, because they have not experienced these in their own childhoods. As children they suffered a deficit of love.
Now, and for the longer term, as a community we have a responsibility to help these parents, and to work towards a community which will not cultivate the alienation they experience. We are all responsible for creating the kind of community we have. These are our difficulties just as much as they are their difficulties. This is not to deny that in the meantime there is a pressing shorter term problem which is to tend to the needy children of these families.
First published on April 17th, 2011 on the goodenoughcaring home page at http://www.goodenoughcaring.com/Home.aspx?cpid=1 

Sunday 17 April 2011

Brief and disparate reflections on attachment theory, the good enough mother, womanhood and the social care of children and young people



During the 1950s and 1960s working independently but contemporaneously John Bowlby and Donald Winnicott developed different  theories about the  psychological and physical growth and wellbeing of children. Bowlby's theory of attachment and Winnicott's notions of the good enough mother and the facilitating environment remain influential in the study of child development.


Attachment Theory

Bowlby's work along with that of the many others who have continued to develop a theory of attachment has been fruitful in raising our awareness of the significance of the attachment relationship between a baby and its principal parenting figure, who is usually the baby's mother. The newly-born baby seeks out a caregiver and the caregiver's response to the baby’s quest influences the development of the baby. For instance the securely attached infant feels that his caregiving figure is accessible and responsive to him when needed, while the anxiously attached infant cannot assume that his caregiver will be responsive and so he adopts strategies to circumvent the  perceived unresponsiveness. Such a strategy may result in a baby denying the emotional tie with a caregiver, or it may be manifested by the baby's need to amplify their signs of distress in order to ensure he will be heard (See Ainsworth and Bowlby,1965).


Winnicott's facilitating environment and the good enough mother

Winnicott's idea of a facilitating environment created for a child by a "good enough mother" who is supported by the adults around her, rests easily alongside Bowlby's theory of attachment.
Bowlby wrote,
"intimate attachments to other human beings are the hub around which a person's life revolves, not only when he is an infant or a toddler or a schoolchild but through his adolescence and his years of maturity and on into old age."   (Bowlby, 1980, p.442)
For Winnicott this hub is provided by unconscious processes within "an ordinary mother who is fond of her baby" (Winnicott,1952) :  a "good enough mother", who learns best how to look after her baby not from health professionals and self-help books but from having been a baby herself ."She acts naturally, naturally " (Winnicott, 1988). Winnicott suggests that during pregnancy a mother develops "a state of heightened sensivity" which continues to be maintained for some weeks after the baby's birth. When this heightened state passes, the mother has what Winnicott calls a "flight into sanity" and she begins to be aware of the world which exists outside of her state of "primary maternal preoccupation" with her infant (Winnicott,1975). Nonetheless the good enough mother continues to provide an environment  which facilitates healthy maturational processes in her baby. She achieves this by being the person who wards off the unpredictable and who actively provides care in the holding, handling and in the general management of the child. The good enough mother provides physical care and meets her baby's need for emotional warmth and love. She also protects her baby against those parts of her from which murderous feelings are brought forth when, for example, her baby screams, yells and cries continuously. By containing her own hateful feelings about her baby, and using them to intuit the baby’s terror and hate, the good enough mother facilitates her baby's feelings and expressions of omnipotence by adapting to his needs until such time as he gradually begins to feel safe enough to relinquish these feelings. At this stage the process of integration can start and the baby begins to develop a sense of "me" and "not me" (Winnicott, 1975). To achieve this shift from the baby's total dependence to relative dependence the good enough mother has, by a gradual process, to fail to adapt to her baby's needs in order that the baby can begin to learn to tolerate the frustrations of the world outside of himself and his mother (Winnicott,1965).
Winnicott always argued that mothers knew better about the needs of her baby than experts. He suggested that there were,
"very subtle things that the mother knows intuitively and without any intellectual appreciation of what is happening, and which she can only arrive at by being left alone and given full responsibility..."      (Winnicott1988,p64).


Criticisms of Winnicott's good enough mother
  
With his notion of the "good enough mother" who intuitively knows best about her baby, Winnicott intended to take the pressure off women who became mothers but critics have argued that Winnicott in his idealisation of the good enough mother has placed  an expectation upon the "real" mother that she must shoulder most of the responsibility for the care her baby. Furthermore she is held responsible for how well the baby flourishes.


On being a woman and a mother 

 In recent times a number of  female writers have borne witness to this responsibility.  For instance recently, Rachel Cusk, at the same time as encapsulating many of Winnicott's ideas about motherhood, observes,

"Becoming a mother reveals a woman's capacity for numerous things : virtue, self-sacrifice, anger, foolishness, love. Some of these qualities will never before have been tested - she may not even have known that she possessed them. Some of them will take their shape exactly from what she was offered by her own mother, though she may not remember being offered them. And some - anger is one - will find forms of their own, of which she feels herself the only progenitor" (Cusk,2011, p36).

For Cusk, "The baby comes and everyone panics, looking for the woman who's going to take care of it." and this she argues is the principal source of a woman's anger when she has a baby,

"because she has lost the power of autonomy and free will in her own life. From the first moment of her pregnancy, a woman finds herself subject to forces over which she has no control, not least those of the body itself. This subjection applies equally to the unknown and the known : she is her body's subject, her doctor's subject, her baby’s subject, and in this biological work she has undertaken she becomes society's and history's subject too. But where she feels the subjection most is in the territories,whatever they are that in her pre-maternal life she made her own. The threat to what made her herself to what made her an individual : this is what the mother finds hardest to live down. Having been told all her life to value her individuality and pursue its aims, she encounters an outright contradiction, a betrayal - even among the very gatekeepers of her identity, her husband or colleagues or friends - in the requirement that she surrender it"  (Cusk,2011.p36).

Even in times when there are more plastic views about how the task of caring for a baby is assigned, when both father and mother at different times may have leave of absence from work to be the baby's primary parenting figure it remains impossible, as Cusk suggests for a woman to escape the biological implications of maternity.
Cusk acknowledges that her feelings may be influenced by her experience of being mothered and recent commentators on attachment theory have indicated that the quality of parenting figures' to attachment to their children is influenced by their own childhood experience of attachment figures (See for instance, Fonagy 2001).
Winnicott too acknowledged that a mother may not be good enough. Such a mother might repeatedly fail to meet the needs of her baby and so the baby grows to be a child who complied to his mother's needs and so in order to survive this developed a false rather than a true self.


Attachment theory, the facilitating environment and the care of children not living in with their own families

Yet Cusk's idea of the panic when a new baby arrives may have an unlikely resonance for those such as residential child care workers and foster carers, who are charged with looking after children and young people who have been deprived of consistent attachment figures,and who have not received "good enough parenting". These children can create a panic in children's services departments and sometimes in the wider communities. When we do we look around for the symbolic "mothering figure"  - man,woman or groupd -  who will take responsibility for them. The trouble is the professional carer's task is that of creating a facilitating maternal environment at a time when a child's development has already been impaired by parental deprivation  and inconsistent parenting. The professional carer who is asked to be a consistent attachment figure and a "good enough mother" first encounters the child when the true self is already well hidden and when powerful false self defences are pre-eminent. In this case the nurture, the good enough caring, the consistent attachment provided can never be primary but has to be a real compensation for  loss and abandonment before any healing can be done. It is in this sense that the carer is addressing what seems like  the panic caused by the arrival of a new baby (albeit one inhabiting for a 5 years old or a 14 years old body) of whom really we know nothing, who we did not experience in the womb  and for whom we have as yet no authentic feelings apart from trepidation and perhaps fear.  For how can the carer know if she will be good enough to deal with the child's indifference to her responses or to the child's omnipotence in the face of the care she offers ?


Charles Sharpe, Totnes, 2011


References

Ainsworth, M. and Bowlby,J.(1965) Child Care and the Growth of Love  London  :  Penguin Books
Bowlby, J. (1980) Loss, Sadness and Depression , Vol 3 of Attachment and Loss   London : Hogarth p.185
Fonagy,P.(2001)Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis   New York : Other Press
Cusk,R.(2011) "From liberty and equality to the maternal grind" in The New Review, The Observer  April 3rd, 2011. A review of Shattered : Modern Motherhood and the Illusion of Equality  by Rebecca Asher published by Harvill Secker. The text of this book review can be accessed at http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/apr/03/shattered-rebecca-asher-motherhood-equality
Winnicott, DW (1952) Letter to Roger Money-Kyrle, 27th November in The Spontaneous Gesture : Selected Letters of D.W. Winnicott      London   Karnac Books (1987,pp 38-43)
Winnicott, D.W.(1965) The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment     London  :  Karnac Books(2005)
Winnicott, D.W.(1958) Collected Papers : Through Paediatrics to Psycho-analysis    London  :  Tavistock Publications (1975)
Winnicott, D.W.(1988) Babies and their Mothers  London : Free Association Books


This opinion piece was first published in March, 2011, on the goodenoughcaring home page  at 
where there are many interesting and informative articles related to parenting and childhood development as well as many other aspects of the care and nurture of children and young people

Sunday 27 March 2011

The poor families get poorer, but the United Kingdom media plays down the significance of the March 26th, 2011, TUC protest about public expenditure cuts.

First posted on March 27th, 2011 on the goodenoughcaring home page at http://www.goodenoughcaring.com/Home.aspx?cpid=1  where many other many articles relating to children, childhood, child development, parenting, families, foster care and residential child care can be found.

In London on Saturday, March 26th, reportedly between 100,000 and 500,000 people - among them child care workers, teachers and health workers - protested legitimately and peacefully about the coalition government's decision to cut drastically our health, education, social and other community services. The British media, including the BBC, chose to focus most of its reporting of the event on a small breakaway group which - though it may have had a valid point to make - protested in a more sensational and destructive way.

The overwhelming response to the TUC's call for a protest march came in a week when the coalition government's budget offered little sustenance to those families with children who struggle on a low income. An analysis of the budget carried out by Tom Horton, the research director of the Fabian Society, and Howard Reed, the director of Landmark Economics, shows that many single-earner families with children and families claiming help with child care are set to lose from tax-and-benefit reform. The report claims that "despite government rhetoric about 'lifting the poorest out of tax' many low income families are set to become bigger contributors to the Exchequer." According to the report these losses occur because for many families, the rise in Value Added Tax and the cuts in tax credits outweigh any gains from the budget's proposed cuts in income tax and national insurance.

The cutting of services and the increased financial burdens to less well off families with children impacts upon what the parents in these families can give to their children. Moreover this has an emotional impact. Parents who are struggling financially often become anxious parents and anxious parents make children anxious. Attention should be drawn to this and that is exactly what the peaceful protesters in London were trying to do. It is therefore tragic as well as ironic that at a time when the coalition government backed by the media is defending the rights of peaceful protesters in other countries, our media deflects attention away from legitimate protests about government policies and financial restrictions which not only cut essential resources for our children and young people but also challenge their basic rights.

Note

The full text of the Fabian Society Report can be found at :

 http://www.fabians.org.uk/images/FabianSociety-LandmanEconomics_post-Budget_report.pdf



Something to reflect on : the trials, tribulations,struggles and excitement of adolescence



First posted on March 24th, 2011 on the goodenoughcaring home page at http://www.goodenoughcaring.com/  where many other many articles relating to children, childhood, child development, parenting, families, foster care and residential child care can be found.


As adults with a responsibility to look after young people who are experiencing the onset of puberty while butting through the storms and languishing in the occasional calms of adolescence, we sometimes adopt a temporary amnesia concerning the trials, tribulations, and the excitement we experienced at that time in our lives. We forget those occasions when we thought or said "When I become a parent I am going to make a better job of the world than my Mum or Dad." Instead an understanding dawns on us of the frustrations our parenting figures felt when we as youngsters thought it unreasonable that we were not, for instance, allowed to stay out late every night. As we rediscover the parenting wheel for ourselves we can appreciate that adolescence is an essential part of the development of both generations. The psychoanalyst, Margot Waddell begins to explore the adolescent phenomenon in this excerpt from her book, Inside Lives .



"......the nature of adolescence and its course are organised around responses to the upheaval of puberty. Adolescence can be described, in narrow terms, as a complex adjustment on the child's part to these major physical and emotional changes. This adjustment entails finding a new, and often hard-won, sense of onself-in-the-world, in the wake of the disturbing latency attitudes and ways of thinking. The means by which this altered relationship to the self may be achieved vary across a very wide range of behaviour, of different modes of defence and adaptation, from being the "conforming", "pseudo adult", "good" boy or girl to being the "tear-away", the "drug addict", the "suicide risk", "bad" boy or girl. It may take several years, or decades,for the turmoil to settle. For adolescents the psychic agenda is a demanding one : the negotiation between adult and infantile structures; the transition from life in the family to life in the world; the finding and establishing of an identity, especially in sexual terms; in short the capacity to manage separation, loss, choice, independence, and perhaps disillusionment with life on the outside."



Reference



Waddell, Margot (1998) Inside Lives  London  :  Karnac Books 2005,  p140



Monday 14 March 2011

Foster Care Controversy





In response to our opinion piece on the recent Question Time programme which was broadcast on March 3rd, 2011, Stuart Russon writes,

'Following the media frenzy over the Derbyshire couple who weren't allowed to foster because of their religious/homophobic views and following your short article about this programme I was struck - without commenting on the moral dilemma itself - by the general view that seemed to pervade most on the Question Time panel and audience when discussing it. The consensus seemed to be that because the child was under 10 that the religious/homophobic views of the foster parents didn't really matter as the child was too young to be influenced (or "is too young to be considering such adult themes"). Now I've always thought that a child of that age is most susceptible to influence and so it does matter. The child WILL be influenced by the thinking/views of the foster parents and this at a possibly critical time in the child's development. Watching the programme was one of those times when I realise how out of kilter I am with public opinion, as I thought, with all due respect to the couple involved, that it was the right decision although the Question Time audience thought otherwise'.

First posted on the goodenoughcaring home page  on March 9th, 2011 at http://www.goodenoughcaring.com  where you have access to many articles about childhood, child care, nurture, parenting, children in care, social pedagogy and therapeutic child care.



Wednesday 9 March 2011

Government minister, Iain Duncan Smith, claims residential child care fails children





Visitors to the goodenoughcaring.com site who watched the programme “Question Time” from Derby on BBC 1 last night, (Thursday,3/3/11) may have heard Iain Duncan Smith, the coalition government’s Secretary of State for Work and Pensions say as an aside to a plea for the recruitment of more foster carers, “that as many children as possible should not be in care homes because ultimately they do not do them any good at all.”
Iain Duncan Smith is right to stress the need to recruit more foster parents for troubled children but there is a significant number of children who, temporarily or more long term, cannot live with their birth families and who, for a variety of reasons, would not have their current needs met in a foster care placement. For them good quality group residential care is less threatening and also has the resources which can accommodate and provide for their complex developmental needs. This is not to be complacent about, or to deny the difficulties residential child care faces, and at the best of times residential child care is a problematic project. In a sense that is how it should be for if it were otherwise something would be seriously wrong.
Iain Duncan Smith is not the minister responsible for children’s homes but he is a rightly respected and influential voice in the coalition government on matters concerning the most needy and vulnerable members of our community. This is why his remark is disappointing for it is surely not stretching things too far to conclude that his views represent the government’s position on this matter. It is disappointing too because he should know that there are many examples of good residential child care being provided throughout England but these are not encouraged or developed further because there is a lack of consistent political commitment and support to the residential child care sector.
The recent Ofsted report on children’s homes in England, Outstanding Children's Homes (2.3.11) highlights examples of the good residential child care practice but implies that the lack of consistent suppport to the sector is reflected in the inconsistency of service provision which Ofsted found. The report recommends that exceptional practitioner leaders in residential child care should be encouraged to spread their practice by being placed at the forefront of the development and training of residential child care workers. Those directly involved with residential child care are wary when they are provided with neat general solutions to the unique and dynamic difficulties faced by individual children but Ofsted's recommendation is to be welcomed if it is intended to free residential child care workers from being manacled to laid down procedures that satisfy the demands of political and senior management “heavyweights” but which, as Mark Smith (2009) and Jim Rose (2010) in their different ways so eloquently demonstrate, do nothing to meet the real personal and intimate needs of children.
This week in Community Care (3.3.11) Camilla Pemberton observes that Ofsted’s report comes after a period of time when support to residential child care in England has been severely reduced. The National Centre for Excellence in Residential Child Care closed last year when the Labour government withdrew its funding. For a time it seemed the private consultancy consortium Tribal would take over much of the NCERCC role until the new Conservative-Liberal Democrat government cancelled the contract with Tribal. This cancellation was broadly welcomed but sadly nothing has been heard from the government about what will be put in place to fill the vacuum left by the excellent service provided by the NCERCC or indeed what will be done to provide the kind of consistent support and leadership for which the Ofsted report asks. In the shadow of Iain Duncan Smith’s remark the government’s silence is concerning.

Sources
Camilla Pemberton (2011) “Ministers need to take the lead on improving children’s homes” in Community Care . Accessed on 3.3.11 at http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2011/03/02/116373/ofsted-urges-ministers-to-boost-childrens-homes-leadership.htm)
Ofsted (2011) Outstanding Children’s Homes Accessed from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted-home/Publications-and-research/Browse-all-by/Documents-by-type/Thematic-reports/Outstanding-children-s-homes
Jim Rose (2010) How Nurture Protects Children : Nurture and narrative in work with children, young people and families London : Responsive Solutions
Iain Duncan Smith statement from “Question Time”, BBC 1 on Thursday, 3rd March, 2011. Re-accessed at http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00z2xk8/Question_Time_03_03_2011/
Mark Smith (2009) Rethinking Residential Child Care : Positive perspectives Bristol : Policy Press

A review of Mark Smith's book can be found at www.goodenoughcaring.com/JournalArticle.aspx?cpid=102 An article by Mark Smith 'Loving and Fearful Relationships' can be found at www.goodenoughcaring.com/JournalArticle.aspx?cpid=52



This opinion piece was first published online at http://www,goodenoughcaring.com/  at 2.15pm  on 4/3/11